Friday, October 26, 2012

BUILDING A DEMOCRATIC VOTER

How to Create a Democrat

To keep liberals (democrats) in office, the leftist power elite (elected democrats and their socialist - commie pinko Soros-clone rich enablers) need people to vote democrat.  So they have this playbook that they pull out every time they get the chance.  This playbook tells them how to create a democratic voter base.  Here's how (outlined):

1. Divide and conquer.  This they do by first convincing blocks of people that they are victims.  Examples of such blocs include hyphenated voter blocs (Hispanic-American, African-American, Native-Americans, women, seniors, sexual extroverts and deviants, illegal aliens, etc. etc.)  The idea is to get them to believe that all others in America are somehow looking for ways to unfairly exploit them.
2. Promise to protect these various blocs from each other and the evil white blue-eyed male population.
3. Pass laws that provide these blocs a label of 'protected' so that any ills that befall them can be punished more severely than the same sort of offense perpetrated against a white blue-eyed male.
4. Provide money to these groups via any method possible (special programs such as Affirmative Action, welfare programs, abortion funding, free contraception, various 'subsidies' (wealth transfer programs) like health care, free college tuition, etc.)
5. Come election time, tell these folks that if they don't vote democrat, the money may stop.

Duh.

So who's a democrat?  Mostly they are people with their hands out for other people's money.

I know you already knew all this, o faithful reader.  But on the off chance that some lefty will drop by, your Ostrich Killer thought it would be amusing to let them know that we have them figured out.

Now, back to my beer.  Too late for coffee.

Friday, October 19, 2012

CHECK THE TRANSCRIPT

HUH?

When Gov. Romney, during the second presidential debate, said that Obama took 14 days to concede that the Benghazi attack was a terrorist action, Obama said that wasn't so, that he'd called it 'terror' the morning after the attack.

Then he pointed at Candy Crowley.  "Check the transcript," Obama said.

She shuffled through papers on her table and confirmed that he had called the attack 'terror' the morning after.

Later investigation revealed that Obama had not been talking about the Benghazi attack when he used the word 'terror,' but let's leave that aside.  Your Ostrich Killer has a few questions:

1.  How is is that Candy Crowley, the 'impartial' moderator, had those transcripts?
2.  Did she have supportive transcripts for Gov. Romney as well?
3.  If so, were both candidates allowed to provide her with transcripts and other documents?
4.  If yes, why haven't we heard that from anyone?  Why wasn't that made public knowledge prior to the debate?
5.  If Candy having transcripts was a surprise to Gov. Romney, how did Candy get those transcripts?
6.  How did Obama know she had those transcripts?
7.  Why did Gov. Romney look so surprised that she had transcripts?
8.  How was it that a question that prompted the invoking of those transcripts got asked?

Your Ostrich Killer smells a set-up and professional malpractice on the part of Candy Crowley, in conspiracy w/ President Obama.  He clearly knew she had transcripts; he probably provided them.  How else could he suggest she consult them?

It's gratifying that the day after the debate, she had to admit that the transcripts were taken out of context and that Gov. Romney had been correct.

What lingers is the willingness of Obama to stoop to any devious trick to try to survive the debates.  For what other purposes has he stooped to such low, Chicago - style tricks?